一般而言，用尽行政补救措施对于雇员在提出福利彩票查询，骚扰或报复性申诉时跳上法院的途径是不必要的障碍。 里卡兹诉UPS （2012年6月19日），___ Cal.App.4th ___只是另一个证明了这一点的案例。
里卡德斯先生要求福利彩票查询其雇主UPS。在加利福尼亚州，雇佣案件中的第一个障碍通常是向加利福尼亚公平就业部提起福利彩票查询指控。& Housing (“DFEH”)(depending on the circumstances, an employee may instead file with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 和 ask that the claim be cross filed with the 财务部). For an employee who has a lawyer 和 intends to sue, there is generally no productive reason to file such a charge, except that failure to do so may be a fatal flaw in the subsequent lawsuit.
公平就业部& Housing set up an online process by which a lawyer can file a charge of 福利彩票查询 online for an employee. According to the 财务部, this process is set up for employees who have lawyers. As part of the filing, the employee (or lawyer!!) fills out an online form 和 moves from screen to screen including a screen that acknowledges that the signature is “…伪证罪”. Previous case law had already established that an attorney may verify a charge of 福利彩票查询 with the 财务部 on behalf of the client. 百隆诉高等法院 （2006）141 Cal.App.4th 418。